New Research Finds Missed Opportunities For The One In Five With Anal Incontinence After Childbirth
Researchers are calling for improved care and more awareness of injuries that leave over one in five of those giving birth with anal incontinence.
Over one in five women will develop anal incontinence in the first five years after having a vaginal birth. Anal incontinence is common and usually caused by trauma to the pelvic floor, nerve damage and anal sphincter injuries.
The timing of symptom onset varies; some women experience anal incontinence onset soon after childbirth (which may or may not resolve), whilst many develop worsening or new symptoms during the menopause.
The University of Warwick-led study, with input from the MASIC Foundation (a national charity to support women who have suffered severe injuries during childbirth), identified missed opportunities in getting a diagnosis of anal incontinence, an absence of clear pathways for those who are referred for treatment, and a lack of awareness of the problem among healthcare professionals and those who have given birth.
The team conducted qualitative interviews on women who have experienced anal incontinence following a childbirth injury, either within seven years of sustaining the injury, or if they identified new, or worsening symptoms of anal incontinence at the time of menopause.
Due to the stigmatising nature of anal incontinence, it is often not reported by those who suffer it, with less than 25% of women discussing their problems with GPs unless prompted. Healthcare professionals may feel uncomfortable asking questions about anal incontinence in postnatal encounters, or lack experience of asking about, detecting and managing the condition. This represents a missed opportunity to identify and refer women to appropriate care pathways.
The study comes as the UK Government aims to address the inequalities in women’s healthcare, with the publication of its Women’s Health Strategy – with the aim of improving health outcomes for women.
It also follows the release of The Ockenden review, published in The Lancet, reporting on women's health in the UK, which stated that the provision of substandard maternity care has led to unnecessary deaths and injuries.
Dr Sarah Hillman, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, said: “We interviewed over 40 women who had experienced anal incontinence due to a childbirth injury. Women reported missed opportunities in gaining a diagnosis – including a lack of examination, delayed or missed diagnosis and normalisation or dismissal of symptoms – and missed opportunities within the provision of appropriate and timely information.
“There is a lack of awareness of the problem both for healthcare professionals and women and a bias towards urinary incontinence. For those who are able to get a diagnosis of anal incontinence, they are often faced with disjointed care pathways. This all contribute to delays in accessing appropriate care for this debilitating problem.
“Going forward we have identified a need to establish clear care pathways for those diagnosed with anal incontinence and a vital need to raise awareness and decrease the taboo of the topic.”
Professor Michael Keighley, President of The MASIC Foundation said: “The MASIC Foundation is the only UK charity to support and campaign for women who suffer severe perineal injury following childbirth. These women can face loss of dignity, social isolation, psychosexual and emotional distress – such as post-traumatic stress and a fear of future childbirth – which results in an unspoken taboo.
“These women need support; from finding a friend who has had a similar injury, to being signposted to interventions that will allow them to better cope with the consequences of the trauma because a cure is rare – something which MASIC can provide. We will continue to campaign for national strategies rolled out through the Royal Colleges that prevent these injuries.
“The paper released today describes the issues faced by these women which will help to raise public awareness of costly injuries, to both the individual and the NHS, many of which are preventable.”
Case study – Anna Clements
Anna Clements, who sustained a severe tear during childbirth, said: “Little did I know when I went into labour 14 years ago that I would sustain this injury. This was my third child, but, even while I was pregnant, I had never heard of anal injuries during childbirth – from family, certainly not through friends that had given birth, or the new mums I had met at previous baby groups. It was a secret, a taboo, that was happening to many first-time mums.
“The physical and psychological impact started from day one. The ‘accidents’ were happening several times a day, I needed to be close to the loo, I needed to constantly shower to make myself feel clean, I was ashamed of my body not being able to perform a basic function to hold onto my stools and wind. I was isolated and I felt so alone. What I also didn’t realise at the time was I was actually one of the lucky ones!
“I had had a theatre repair straight after giving birth, so I was on the pathway to get the help I needed. With a colorectal team to guide me I found surgical and conservative treatments that would improve my quality of life. I had a multidisciplinary team that treated me holistically and I accepted all the help I was being offered. I attended a support group and met other injured women like me, I was overwhelmed with emotion to have found others who knew exactly what I was feeling.
“Daily life is still hard, I live with depression, anxiety and physical symptoms that have got worse as I reached perimenopause. I have had to change a 25-year career that I loved, because of my unpredictable incontinence and the restrictions it brings. This study has identified where missed opportunities are to educate and treat women. I believe that all women should be informed antenatally of the risks of an anal injury and understand that if a severe injury does happen, what treatment options are available, and who to turn to for advice.”
This project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number NIHR202172). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Read the study, published in PLOS ONE here – https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287779