top of page
  • Writer's pictureHinton Magazine

Threat of losing money is the best incentive for weight loss and healthy behaviour, study shows

The prospect of losing money is the most effective way to ‘nudge’ people to eat healthily, lose weight, and exercise more, research shows.


Researchers from the UK, Thailand, and Australia conducted a review of more than 30 studies into the use of financial incentives to promote healthy behaviour.


They found that a ‘deposit contract’ – where people set aside a sum of money, which they would lose if they failed to hit their objectives – was up to 50 per cent more effective than other forms of financial incentives while they were participating it in the program.



It was also the only form of financial incentive that led to people maintaining their weight loss and healthier habits after the programme finished.


Report co-author Ivo Vlaev, Professor of Behavioural Science at Warwick Business School, said: “We all know that healthy diet and regular physical activity can prevent obesity and associated diseases.


“Yet the latest figures from the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities show that nearly two thirds of adults in England are now obese or overweight. That is fuelling an increase in diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease, all of which place a growing burden on the NHS.


“Conventional attempts to promote healthy behaviour – such as taxes on sweetened beverages, legislation, and the five-a-day information campaign – have produced limited benefits.


“However, our findings suggest that financial incentives can improve the effectiveness of these interventions, if they are designed correctly.”


The review, published in the Annals of Behavioural Medicine, analysed the impact of four types of financial incentives, compared to healthy lifestyle initiatives that offered no monetary rewards.


These included deposit contracts; entry into a lottery for all participants who met their targets; a regret lottery where all participants received a ticket, but only those who met their target could win the prize; and standard financial incentives that paid participants a small sum for every day or week that they met their healthy objectives.


Deposit schemes were the most effective, followed by regret lotteries, driven by the fact that people dislike losing money more than they enjoy gaining an equivalent amount of cash.


However, lotteries only provided short-term increases in physical activity.


Professor Vlaev, a member of the Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science for the Department of Health and Social Care, said: “There are several arguments in favour of deposit contracts.


“They had the best effect of any financial incentive and are widely considered to be fairer and less controversial, as participants fund their own healthy behaviours.


“However, people may be deterred by the prospect of losing money if they do not meet their goals. Allowing them to set their own deposit, aligned to their income, may help to overcome such issues.


“Financial incentives to promote healthy behaviours appear to be worthy of further consideration.”

Comments


bottom of page